Wednesday, May 20, 2026

How to Acquire an Oregon Cannabis License

It’s been a while since we wrote a “brass tacks” post on Oregon cannabis licensing. This blog post will cover some FAQs, from the perspective of an attorney who has worked on hundreds of these deals, since the very first licenses were transferred.

Is OLCC issuing new marijuana licenses?

Yes, but on a “one in and one out” protocol. The only way to acquire a cannabis license in Oregon is to find a willing seller, and enter into a coordinated transaction with that seller and OLCC. This protocol has followed Oregon’s robust secondary market for “naked license” transfers since January 1, 2022, when the OLCC stopped taking new license applications due to a saturated market and administrative backlog.

What types of cannabis licenses are available?

OLCC issues five main marijuana business licenses: producer, processor, wholesaler, retailer and laboratory. Producer licenses are offered at various canopy sizes, both indoor and outdoor—and a buyer is allowed to scale up or down. In other words, a micro-tier producer can agree to “sell” its license to an incoming licensee at a Tier I or II designation.

For the sake of completion, there is also a research certificate. Those are available from OLCC directly, and not subject to the “one in one out” policy.

How do I find a license?

You need to find a seller. Sometimes that happens through word of mouth and networking; other times, people source these deals through brokers. We recommend CannXperts as the gold standard there. We also recommend, very strongly, to never sign any type of “license sale” agreement offered by a broker. It’s a sad fact of life in my office that we deal with messed up broker situations on a weekly basis.

What do licenses cost?

Prices have fluctuated over the years. Today, we are seeing producer licenses trade hands in the $90K – $120K range. Processor licenses are selling for $25K – $30K. Wholesalers are going for that or less. And retail licenses are generally priced in accordance with a store’s performance. A store humming along at $1.5M in annual sales, for example, will sell for much more than a store doing $500K.

What does a license purchase agreement look like?

Most of them take the form of an asset purchase agreement, and may include additional assets (e.g. equipment, inventory), in addition to the license transferred. Less frequently— but especially for larger deals—we’ve structured these as stock sales. There’s typically an escrow component, as well, with an escrow agreement.

Prior to all of this, there is often a (non-binding) LOI, and sometimes even a non-disclosure agreement. It’s critical to have attorney eyes on anything you hope to sign; or better yet, have an attorney do the drafting so you don’t waste time and money fighting terrible forms.

Can my license issue in a new location?

Yes. Many of these deals have a change-in-location component, as well as a change-in-ownership. Either way, OLCC requires a land use compatibility statement (LUCS) for the incoming licensee, and will also require a notarized proof of landlord consent in the context of producer and processor licenses. The outgoing and incoming licensees will also need to pass an inspection by an OLCC inspector, at each relevant location.

What should I do first?

Once you find a willing seller, it’s time to do some basic diligence. This can occur prior to signing a purchase agreement, or in a defined, post-signing window. Some diligence will be basic, like whether a seller is a business in good standing with the Oregon Secretary of State (some aren’t), and whether the person representing the seller does, in fact, have authority to sell (some don’t). Other diligence will be specific to the license type: for example, in the case of retail, the seller will need to acquire a Certificate of Tax Compliance from the Oregon Department of Revenue.

How do I apply? And what documents are required?

You apply through OLCC’s CAMP online portal. If you’d like a preview of what is required, the forms are here. Certain owners will need to submit to a background check, which includes fingerprints and such.

After creating a CAMP account and uploading your application documents, you pay the applicable fees, and respond to any follow-up requests from the Commission. Those will typically come after your file is assigned to an investigator, which is happening within a week of completed applications at this point.

Anyone working on site, including owners, will also need to acquire a marijuana worker permit.

How much does it cost?

Costs vary by license type and, in the case of producer licenses, by canopy size. There is also a $250 application fee across all license types. Beyond that, OLCC publishes a comprehensive list of fees on its site—just click the “Fees” link under the “Other Forms and Resources” header.  Finally, be aware that certain jurisdictions, like the City of Portland, have their own licensing requirements and annual fee schedules. Those requirements are mostly ill-conceived and redundant, but you have to comply regardless.

What happens after I submit?

After submission, OLCC reviews the application and may request more information. If the application clears the initial review, the agency can conduct an inspection or otherwise verify compliance before issuing the license, and background checks are part of the overall review process for applicants.

How long does it take?

Timing depends on the license type, the completeness of your application, and availability of inspectors in the relevant region. We’ve seen organized transactions sale through in two or three month timeframe. It’s also worth noting that all applicants must complete the application process within 60 calendar days of investigator assignment. Otherwise, OLCC will “unassign” the application, which can cause real issues in respect of purchase agreements.

What mistakes should I avoid?

I covered the broker thing already. Another problem we see frequently is outgoing licensees handing over the keys prior to approval, sometimes under the purview of a services agreement, at which point financial considerations may become muddled, and compliance issues often accrue. Another problem relates to landlord negotiations and assuming a lease will be assignable when it isn’t. But, the biggest problem of all is just handing money over without protections, for any number of reasons. Unfortunately, it happens a lot.

Bottom line

The secondary market for Oregon cannabis license transfers is robust. From this lawyer’s perspective, the process is straightforward with no need for undue complexity. OLCC is easy to work with nowadays, and these deals have straightforward protocols from start to finish.

That said, there are also numerous pitfalls, and no shortage of unscrupulous characters. It’s best to work with someone who does this every day, to make sure you get in (or out) with minimal friction, and the best possible protection. Call us if you sizing up a deal.

The post How to Acquire an Oregon Cannabis License appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/Ea6pGzH
via IFTTT

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

How to travel with weed: Our essential tips

How to travel with weed: practical tips for flying, driving, camping, and hotels, plus what to know about state laws and TSA.

The post How to travel with weed: Our essential tips appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/l19grz0
via IFTTT

Thursday, May 7, 2026

The best travel weed gear of 2026

Recommendations on the best travel weed gear are made by Leafly Picks editors after firsthand tests, extensive research, and internal debate. If you buy through links on this page, we may earn a small commission. Jetsetting. Galavanting. Roamin’ and ramblin’. Whatever you call getting from here to there, it’s better with weed, and we’re here […]

The post The best travel weed gear of 2026 appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/Lm3HsKC
via IFTTT

Celebrate moms and Memorial Day with these CBD, delta-9, and THCA deals

Mother's Day and Memorial Day weekend fall back-to-back, which means you have two excellent excuses to shop for CBD, delta-9, and THCA.

The post Celebrate moms and Memorial Day with these CBD, delta-9, and THCA deals appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/KYSPHXr
via IFTTT

Monday, May 4, 2026

Medical Marijuana Rescheduling Q&A: Cutting Through the Noise

Since acting Attorney General Todd Blanch announced that state-legal medical marijuana would move to Schedule III, the commentary has been relentless — hot takes, doomsayers, and self-proclaimed experts flooding LinkedIn with conflicting interpretations. Much of it is speculative, overstated, and uneducated. This piece cuts through the noise and responds to the questions I have fielded the most about state medical programs.

The DOJ order shifts state-legal medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III and establishes an optional DEA registration framework through which state-licensed operators may seek to participate. The confusion, on whether registration is mandatory, stems from confusion over two federal provisions: (1) 21 USC 811(d)(1)— a provision that suddenly everyone claims to understand, but few actually do; and (2) 26 USC 280E.

Q: Why does 21 USC 811(d)(1) matter now?

It largely didn’t for industry, until now. The industry spent years chasing legislative solutions, whether full legalization, SAFE Banking, or uplisting. This provision sat ignored, despite a handful of us arguing its importance. Legal and policy wonks like me were talking about 811(d)(1) to any operators and industry associations who would listen. All of them brushed us aside. Ironically, many operators who ignored us then are unlikely to obtain the maximum benefits from it now.

21 USC 811(d)(1) allows the Attorney General to “issue an order controlling such drug” if doing so is required by U.S. obligations under the Single Convention. There is an important distinction between that language and what actually occurred: that is, DEA didn’t reschedule a “drug”; instead, it rescheduled a program. Further, under U.S. law, what constitutes a “drug” is a determination to be made by FDA under the Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act. These are likely two of the main arguments Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) will make in its forthcoming litigation.

Q: Does 280E apply to state licensed medical operators who don’t register with DEA?

No, it does not. Tax code 280E prohibits deduction and credits for any trade or business trafficking in Schedule I or II substances. The order includes the following: “as a consequence of this rule, state licensees will no longer be subject to the deduction disallowance imposed by Section 280E.” Further, “[t]he final rule places in schedule III . . . marijuana subject to a state medical marijuana license.”

IRC 280E says nothing about DEA registration. The only qualification for schedule III placement, is that marijuana is subject to a state medical marijuana reprogram. Therefore, whether a state license operators is DEA registered is not a factor in whether it is operating with a schedule III substance. Only its state legality and license matters. For more information on the tax implications of this final rule, please read Vince Sliwoski’s blog post last week.

Q: What is the likelihood of opponents’ litigation prevailing?

This question should be the first one operators ask , but surprisingly, it rarely is. If SAM, or anyone else challenging this rescheduling order prevails, all of this will be for naught. As noted above, there are substantial legal questions as to whether DEA exceeded its authority in issuing this order. I believe there is greater than a 50% chance that this order is stayed and ultimately overturned. It is not 100% certain, however, which is why I recently published a blog post calling DEA registration a “Calculated Risk.” If you already have a medical license and all that is required is $10,000–$15,000 to hire an attorney and apply for registration, you have much better odds than playing Powerball or going to Vegas.

Q: Do international treaty obligations apply to state-licensed operators?

This depends on who you ask. The U.S. has maintained for years that international drug treaty obligations do not apply to state-licensed programs. That position, vocalized by Patt Prugh at the 2024 CND (though the video has since been removed), has not been refuted under this administration. The U.S. position is that the international drug treaties “take a ‘highly respectful’ stance toward member states’ domestic policies,” and much of those obligations apply, subject to each member state’s constitutional limits.

Even with the recent rescheduling order, state-licensed medical operators without DEA registration remain federally illegal and fall outside treaty scope (though this is a heavily contested issue within the international treaty community). In the face of Canada and Uruguay legalizing recreational marijuana, the Netherlands’ coffee shop model, and the Dutch and Swiss scientific adult-use pilot programs, it is difficult to argue that applying the Single Convention’s constitutional limitation to state-legal, non-DEA-registered medical marijuana programs is inappropriate. Under the U.S.’ current position, only those operators that join the federal DEA registration apparatus would be required to comply with U.S. treaty obligations. Whether DEA will take this stance, however, is unknown. Under the rescheduling order’s wording, DEA could certainly apply those obligations to state-legal, but non-DEA-registered, operators. That said, enforcing these obligations would be a nightmare for DEA. Where will the funding and staffing come from?

Q: How does the order affect dual-license operators?

Unevenly. Medical-only states stand to benefit most. Dual-license states, those with both medical and adult-use programs, face a harder path. The DEA application asks directly: “Will your firm be handling or dispensing recreational marijuana?” It would make sense if an honest “yes” results in denial. A fraudulent “no” would likely lead to worse.

There is no way DEA has the staff to personally review all applications, let alone implement the program commenced in the order. As such, it is likely DEA will take two steps to aid in review: (1) launch an initial AI review of all applications; and (2) deny as many applications as possible. Denying an application because the applicant also handles recreational marijuana seems obvious. That said, if you are a dual licensee, I still think it’s worth applying, just in case I am wrong.

Q: What happens with interstate commerce?

Interstate transfers between DEA registrants are theoretically possible, but FDA has not clarified whether they are permissible under the Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act. Until it does, such transfers carry legal risk. Enforcement discretion may fill the gap in practice, but operators should not rely on that.

Q: Can a company move product between its own DEA-registered facilities in different states?

Possibly. Internal transfers between a company’s own registered locations may not constitute a “sale” or “marketing” activity under the FDCA, potentially keeping federal food and drug law out of the picture. If so, state law governs what can ultimately be sold. Transfers between separately owned DEA registrations in different states, would remain subject to the FDC&A, so FDA guidance on this will be important. All of this remains unsettled, and operators should seek counsel before acting on that assumption.

Q: What if state law prohibits interstate transport?

State law controls DEA registration indirectly. Registration requires a valid state license. If a state enforces a ban on interstate transport through license suspension or revocation, federal authorization goes with it. Operators need to map their state-level exposure before pursuing DEA registration. If the importing state denies that transport, Dormant Commerce Clause implications would certainly follow. If the exporting state prohibits such transfers, however, it remains unclear whether the Dormant Commerce Clause would apply. What is clear is that in states where legislation has already legalized interstate transport, such transfers will likely carry far less legal uncertainty upon federal legality.

Q: Where do tribal operators stand?

In limbo. The order does not clearly address tribal eligibility for DEA registration. The application references tribal law violations, but stops short of recognizing tribal licenses as a valid basis for registration. Tribal operators should consider applying while simultaneously pursuing advocacy. Waiting for clarity may mean waiting indefinitely.

Q: What current DEA regulations will apply to state-licensed, DEA-registered medical operators, and what won’t?

21 CFR 1318 applies treaty obligations to DEA registrants operating with marijuana, so this section will certainly apply. The rescheduling order largely punts other requirements to state medical marijuana programs, leaving operators without a clear roadmap. DEA has promulgated an extensive body of regulations applicable to controlled substances and those who handle them (see 21 CFR 1300 et seq.) and it is not yet clear which of those regulations will be required of registered state-licensed operators, and which will be displaced by state law requirements.

What DEA has clarified, at least in part, is that holding a valid state license will allow registrants to bypass much of 21 CFR 1301, the section governing the registration process itself. Beyond that carve-out, however, the picture remains murky.

For now, operators pursuing registration are effectively agreeing to enter a federal regulatory framework without knowing its full contours. This is another dimension of the calculated risk that registration represents.

Q: Does acknowledging violations of federal law prior to obtaining DEA registration put an operator at greater risk than already exists?

Presumably, state-legal medical operators have been filing taxes since inception, so responding to this question in the application will not suddenly make anything newly known to the federal government. Is it a risk? Yes. But is it more of a risk than what state-legal operators have already been doing? I don’t think so.

One thing all operators should do is ensure their employees (down to the budtenders) are comfortable with their names and Social Security numbers being provided to DEA. An operator can make this disclosure a condition of employment, but they should give employees advance notice and the option to leave if they prefer not to be disclosed. Disclosing without such notice could lead to legal liability.

Q: What does this mean for patients?

Very little has changed. Medical marijuana patients remain federally illegal because the drug has not received FDA approval. Until further guidance is issued, patients should proceed as if the order does not exist: do not travel across state or international borders with marijuana, and understand that restrictions on housing and firearm ownership remain fully in effect.

Q: What does this mean, if anything, for Congress overturning the intoxicating hemp products ban effective November 12th?

I believe this order makes it less likely that Congress will pass an amendment or extend the effective date of the hemp ban. Many Republicans already oppose reversing the ban, and rescheduling has not helped. I believe many will stand firm in opposing any changes, simply as a stand against this rescheduling move by the Administration.

Conclusion

The bottom line: rescheduling is meaningful, but its practical impact is narrow, uneven, and still developing. Anyone telling you otherwise is getting ahead of the facts. If you are navigating these questions and want an objective, experienced perspective from practitioners who have been working through these issues for years — not weeks — we are happy to offer a free consultation. Reach out to our team anytime.

The post Medical Marijuana Rescheduling Q&A: Cutting Through the Noise appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/nSU1Wgk
via IFTTT

Friday, May 1, 2026

Star signs and cannabis strains: May 2026 horoscopes

Your May 2026 horoscopes arrive with intense, volatile energy, kicking off a month marked by emotional reactivity and deep introspection.

The post Star signs and cannabis strains: May 2026 horoscopes appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/FdwnzK7
via IFTTT

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

A Calculated Bet: DEA Registration is Open, and the Clock is Ticking

For state-licensed medical marijuana operators, a narrow and potentially transformative window has opened–one that could position your business for future interstate and even global trade.

While the Acting Attorney General’s rescheduling order is likely to face legal challenges, the immediate reality is this: you have a 60-day opportunity to act. As of yesterday, April 28, state medical marijuana licensees may apply for DEA registration to manufacture (this includes cultivation and limited processing), to distribute, and to dispense medical marijuana.

The DEA dispensary application portal is already live, and applications for manufacturing and distribution are expected to follow the standard DEA Form 225 process.

We are not certain whether this framework will survive judicial review, and if so, to what extent. What is clear, however, is that only applicants who submit within this initial 60-day window are positioned for expedited review, which is to occur within six months of an applicant’s submission. The rescheduling order provides no guidance on future application rounds or timelines, leaving significant ambiguity for those who wait.

In practical terms, this creates a first-mover advantage. If DEA registration ultimately becomes the gateway to a federally recognized, and potentially global, medical cannabis market, early applicants will be best positioned to participate.

We describe this as a “lottery ticket” not because it is speculative, but because it requires an upfront investment with uncertain outcomes. Engaging experienced counsel and preparing a compliant application typically involves costs in the range of $10,000 to $15,000 (including the DEA fee), with additional costs depending on complexity, scope, and the number of DEA registrations sought. The bet is $10,000-$15,000 for a potential upside opportunity into the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars.

For those prepared to move forward, we can help you navigate this process efficiently and strategically. Our team is one of very few that is experienced in DEA registrations. We can:

  • Provide a clear overview of the DEA registration framework and historical precedent
  • Prepare you for likely DEA follow-up inquiries and supplemental information requests
  • Assist in completing and submitting your application
  • Develop a comprehensive supporting package to strengthen your submission, should DEA seek supplemental information
  • Advise on international treaty obligations and operational compliance considerations referenced in the order

If you are considering pursuing DEA registration during this window, we encourage you to connect with our team to discuss your options. We are available to provide a complimentary consultation and help you evaluate whether this opportunity aligns with your business strategy.

___________

For recent posts on the rescheduling order, check out the following:

The post A Calculated Bet: DEA Registration is Open, and the Clock is Ticking appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/vAYl0MZ
via IFTTT