Tuesday, August 27, 2024

Thoughts on DEA’s Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing Announcement (Dec. 2)

Yesterday, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) near-noticed a hearing for its marijuana rescheduling proposal. The hearing would begin on December 2, 2024 at 9 a.m. ET, and may span multiple days or even weeks. The announcement came via an unpublished “notice of hearing on proposed rulemaking” (NOH).

The final NOH is set for publication this Thursday, August 29. However, nothing should change between now and then. This means that we finally know with certainty that if marijuana rescheduling happens, it won’t be until after the November elections.

Below are some thoughts on the latest development, in Q&A format.

Did you tell us so?

Yes, we told you so. Back in March, when DEA agreed to initiate rulemaking to reschedule marijuana, I wrote that “I doubt cannabis will be on Schedule III by November.” More recently, during the open comment period, I again stated that “you can expect this process to be ongoing at the time of the November elections.”

Why are you telling us that you told us so?

It’s fun of course; but more than that, I believe expectations by some have been overly optimistic as to rescheduling timelines. I am not just talking about on social media. I’ve seen dubious forecasts in investment pro formas and elsewhere.

At this point, cannabis businesses should check their expectations for planning purposes (specifically tax planning purposes) at least through next year. There is still no guarantee the Schedule III will happen, and there is certainly no guarantee that Schedule III would apply to the 2024 tax year.

What can cannabis businesses do at this point?

Wait a few days for NOH to drop, then sign up to participate in the hearing if that is of interest to you. You’ll have 30 days from the date of NOPHR to sign up, which is September 28, 2024, I believe.

Other than that, the comment period on DEA’s proposed Schedule III rule closed last month. You could be calling and writing your Congressional reps, I suppose, but even the most powerful and vocal among them haven’t been able to move things along.

Interested parties should also remain on the lookout for proposed “marijuana specific controls” from DEA, which should accompany the current proposed rules at some point. That could be a whole ‘nother can of worms, as I explained back in May.

Did Biden muck things up?

I sort of think he did. Back in January, I argued that “Biden passed the buck, putting us on an uncertain, circuitous path” when he instigated this process. He could have done more, and sooner, in keeping with his campaign promises.

Now that we know a hearing will not occur until December, it seems more likely than ever that marijuana will remain on Schedule I through January, when we have a new President. I’d like to be wrong.

Are more delays on the horizon?

Could be, to the extent that the NOH could even be considered a “delay.” Beyond that, it’s hard to say. DEA has a lot of discretion to speed up or slow down this process. From the Administration’s perspective, a slower process could help insulate its decisions, especially given all of the eyeballs on this thing (over 40,000 comments submitted).

And yet, while DEA might try to run a cautious, transparent process, the prospect of litigation around rescheduling is very real. It’s also possible that a new President attempts to put the brakes on things come January. I don’t think this is likely, but I’m no pundit either. For some scuttlebutt on that, Marijuana Moment ran a good piece yesterday.

What’s next for marijuana rescheduling?

Nobody knows exactly, including probably DEA Administrator Anne Milgram.

So, sit tight and enjoy the end of summer. In the meantime, check out the following, related posts:

The post Thoughts on DEA’s Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing Announcement (Dec. 2) appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/ldmJ3Gi
via IFTTT

Friday, August 23, 2024

Leafly’s 5 top THCA flower brands of 2024

Find the best THCA flower of 2024. Leafly reviewed popular THCA flower strains & chose the top picks for different needs & budgets.

The post Leafly’s 5 top THCA flower brands of 2024 appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/9jRGqWL
via IFTTT

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

Minnesota Could Be a Great Cannabis State

We have been following Minnesota’s progress on cannabis legalization for a while here at the law firm. It’s a state with huge potential, and reports from our attorneys at CannaCon last weekend were glowing. As a native Minnesotan (Duluth; Moorhead) who frequently returns to the state, I’m personally rooting hard.

There is a lot to like about Minnesota and cannabis. One, it’s sort of an island. To the west are North and South Dakota, which are virtual cannabis backwaters. The same could be said for Iowa to the south, and Wisconsin (so sad!) due east. Second, Minnesota is a populous state, with more than 5.7 million inhabitants. Third, Minnesota is an agriculture state, and the 12th largest state by area. Fourth, it’s reliably blue.

But fifth, if you ask me what I like best about Minnesota’s cannabis environment so far, it’s this: the state seems keen on avoiding overregulation of cannabis. You can see it in the first draft of rules released by the Office of Cannabis Management (“OCM”) on July 31, 2024. If you’d rather not read all of that, or even take my word for it, OCM itself has said as much. In that Office’s words, the proposed rules:

“reflect a desire to construct a regulatory environment that (1) focuses on outcomes and affords regulated entities the autonomy to choose the best path to compliance, (2) is designed to be scalable with the Minnesota system of microbusiness licenses, mezzobusiness licenses, and activity-specific licenses, and (3) where possible, minimizes regulatory duplication by relying on existing state regulation.”

Let’s go!

I’ve written plenty on this blog about what states should be doing as they roll out cannabis programs. See: Ten Recommendations for State Cannabis Regulation. Generally speaking, Minnesota is doing a good job adhering to the model. (I plan to do a deeper dive on the draft rules themselves in weeks to come). But if things go as advertised, cannabis in Minnesota will be regulated more rationally, and less oppressively, than what we are seeing in any other state.

Anyone visiting Minnesota for the past couple of years will have noticed this milieu taking shape. Local shoppers have been able to walk into grocery stores and buy hemp-THC beverages for a couple of years now. Hell, you can even get these beverages on tap at this point, in certain bars, restaurants, and breweries. Once adult-use cannabis businesses are licensed, buying weed in Minnesota should resemble purchasing alcohol at a bottle shop, more than anything.

It’s also worth mentioning that Minnesota Statute Chapter 342, the law underpinning the Minnesota cannabis program, as amended and signed by Tim Walz on May 24, 2024, is clear that home cultivation of cannabis is allowed in Minnesota today. No one has to wait for a OCM rules to drop. Meanwhile, the hemp regime is being wisely folded into the structure, and the medical cannabis program (around since 2015) is still in place.

Here at the law firm, we are actively working with Minnesota social equity applicants and potential licensees, and we will continue to track this space as the draft rules evolve. The next “deadline” is the close of the comment period on those draft rules, which is August 30 (next Friday). Later this year, OCM will publish a notice of intent to adopt revised rules in the State Register, with final rules targeted for spring 2025.

Until then, keep your eyes on Minnesota cannabis. I am.

The post Minnesota Could Be a Great Cannabis State appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/q7f9QxU
via IFTTT

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Thursday, August 8, 2024

Free chips + drink deal at Cheba Hut “Toasted” Subs in NoHo

Cheba Hut “Toasted” Subs NoHo is offering free chips & a drink with code LEAFLY when you buy a Blunt. Get this exclusive deal before it goes.

The post Free chips + drink deal at Cheba Hut “Toasted” Subs in NoHo appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/EBDKx1L
via IFTTT

Tuesday, August 6, 2024

Cannabis Cultivation in Australia

Growing Cannabis in Australia

Though growing cannabis for personal use remains illegal in most Australian states and territories, growing for medicinal and scientific purposes was legalized under federal law in 2016.

Under federal law, cultivation includes sowing seeds, planting, growing, tending, nurturing, harvesting, grafting, dividing, or transplanting a cannabis plant. Production is the separation of cannabis and cannabis resin from the plants, and manufacturing is transforming cannabis or resin into a drug or extract.

The cultivation, production, or manufacturing of cannabis for medicinal or scientific purposes requires federal government licences and permits. These are issued by the Office of Drug Control under the Narcotic Drugs Act 1967. A licence is required before a permit can be obtained.

There are no limits to the number of available licences, but the overall quantities of cannabis produced in Australia must not exceed domestic requirements. The number of licensed cultivators therefore depends on the federal government’s assessment of demand for medicinal cannabis in Australia.

Australian Medicinal Cannabis Licence

To obtain a medicinal cannabis licence in Australia, the applicant must demonstrate sufficient business experience and a sound and stable financial background. They must be of good repute and have appropriate and secure sites.

Evidence that the applicant is a fit and proper person with suitable staff will be required. Details of the applicant’s business associates and other associates are also needed. Thorough plans of the site must be submitted along with security details. Depending on the location of the business, additional state, territory, and local government authorisations will also be necessary. Obviously, the business owner would need a tax file number issued by the Australian Taxation Office and would need to be registered for payment of GST.

The federal government  application fee for an initial medicinal licence is presently A$13,560 (US$ 8,900). There is also an annual licence charge, which is presently A$27,830 (US$ 18,200).

Australian Medicinal Cannabis Permits

Permits can be obtained only when a licence has been granted.

The applicant for a permit must explain how propagation will occur and provide particulars of the propagation source and materials. When the permit relates to cultivation, the total number of plants must be stated. The total amount of cannabis to be produced must be specified when the permit relates to production. The supply pathway must also be detailed, meaning that the applicant must demonstrate arrangements with buyers that are registered pharmacists, doctors, or scientists. A risk management plan is required, and the permit holder must be prepared to report quarterly to the Office of Drug Control.

The federal government application fees for initial permits range from A$8,000 to A$12,100 (US$5,300 to US$7,900). Compulsory inspection fees also apply, and these currently range from A$4,840 to $A12,810 (US$3,200 to US$8,400).

More on Australian Cannabis Cultivation

For more on Australiana cannabis cultivation, please check out our website, or our update as to recreational use legislation from earlier this year.

The post Cannabis Cultivation in Australia appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/bJmLXrK
via IFTTT

Monday, August 5, 2024

A Guide to Leasing to California Cannabis Tenants

Leasing to California Cannabis Tenants

Leasing commercial real estate to a cannabis business in California can be a great opportunity for the right lessor, but it comes with significant risks. It’s important for lessors to understand these risks before entering into a lease with a cannabis business. This guide examines various questions our cannabis landlord clients frequently ask my law firm’s attorneys regarding leasing California properties to cannabis businesses.

1. What Risks Do I Face as a Commercial Landlord If I Decide to Rent to a Cannabis Tenant?

One of the most significant issues lessors must understand is that cannabis is still illegal. While California permits cannabis sales, cannabis remains a schedule I controlled substance under federal law, meaning the US treats it the same way as heroin. And while cannabis may soon be rescheduled to schedule III, that won’t make it federally legal.

This discrepancy exposes lessors to potential legal repercussions, from potential civil asset forfeiture to automatic and in some cases incurable defaults under mortgage contracts. While these risks cannot be completely eliminated, there are some risk-mitigation strategies that sophisticated cannabis lessors routinely use, including:

Insisting on Strict Compliance with State Regulations: Lessors can reduce a huge amount of legal risks by ensuring that tenants adhere to all state and local cannabis laws, including by obtaining necessary licenses and permits. Some lessors opt to undertake regular audits or inspections, although many lessors don’t know what to look for any don’t want to be involved on a regular basis – which is where a good cannabis attorney can be immensely beneficial.

Including Provisions for Lease Termination: Good leases always enumerate ways for the lessor to terminate the lease. Many of these “standard” termination provisions fail to address cannabis-specific risks. A good cannabis lease will include cannabis-specific termination provisions, such as by allowing early termination if a tenant engages in cannabis activity before a permit is awarded, if there are significant changes in federal law, or if enforcement actions occur.

Addressing Potential Risks in the Lease Agreement: A good cannabis lease will also address risks specific to cannabis leasing, including zoning regulations, compliance requirements, and so one. I address many of these issues later in this post.

2. My Prospective Tenant Says She Needs a Signed Lease Before She Can Obtain a Permit to Operate, But I Don’t Want Her to Move In Without a Permit. How Can I Protect Myself?

Obtaining a cannabis business permit often requires a signed lease, creating a dilemma for landlords. But, it is not insurmountable. Here are some common strategies we see cannabis lessors take:

Requiring permits before lease effectiveness: Lessors often mitigate these risks by prohibiting their tenant from operating prior to obtaining a permit. In some cases, a lease will be signed effective as of date X but not have a “commencement date” until the tenant is permitted. This will ensure that a tenant doesn’t have a right to use or in some cases even fully access the premises, even with a signed lease.

Incentivizing speedy licensing: Cannabis tenants often ask for reduced rent while seeking licensure, or for having an early termination right if they are unable to secure licensure within a specific time frame. In these cases, it’s in the lessor’s best interest to ensure that the tenant aggressively pursues licensure. So, a smart lessor will negotiate clear time frames. These lessors will also require the tenant to provide regular updates on permit applications — especially important if the lessor has rent-reduction provisions — so that they can make sure that the tenant is actually doing what it is supposed to be doing.

Clarifying Termination Rights: Tenant timing obligations and milestones are great, but if there is no penalty for failing to meet the milestones, they are effectively optional. Good leases will permit the lessor to terminate should the tenant fail to timely get permitted or achieve other permit-related milestones on time.

3. Will the Mortgage on My Building Be Affected By My Having a Cannabis Tenant?

Most commercial mortgage agreements include clauses restricting property use that violates federal law. Since cannabis remains illegal federally, this means that the lessor can automatically find themselves in default under their mortgage agreement. To address this, cannabis landlords often:

Review Mortgage Agreements Carefully: One of the first things a good cannabis attorney will recommend to a lessor is to review their mortgage documents for clauses prohibiting cannabis activities. Many cannabis lessors have absolutely no idea that these prohibitions exist and without proper consideration can really shoot themselves in the foot.

Consult Lender: If a mortgage contract contains anti-cannabis language, lessors often contact their lender to seek consent. Some lenders will consent, but many will not. If a lender won’t consent, and the lessor can’t pay off the loan or refinance immediately, the lease probably won’t work. We’ve seen plenty of cases where both parties invest time and money into lease negotiations only for the lessor to pull out at the last second after the lender says “no” to a cannabis tenant. Nobody wants to be in that position.

Explore Cannabis-Friendly Financing: If a lender won’t consent and a lessor doesn’t have cash to pay off the loan, the lessor may explore refinancing. Given that interest rates are high at the moment, and that financing options are pretty limited when it comes to cannabis businesses, this may not be a viable option for all lessors.

4. My Property Insurance Premiums Are Going to Increase Due to Cannabis Risks. Should I Pass This Cost Onto the Tenant?

Leasing to a cannabis tenant can lead to increased property insurance premiums due to the higher risk associated with cannabis operations. And, some insurers refuse to over coverage to cannabis-related ventures,. Here too, lessors available options:

Seeking Cannabis-Friendly Insurance: The first thing lessors must do is to see whether leasing to a cannabis business is likely to lead to coverage issues under their current policies. If so, there are plenty of brokers who specialize in procuring policies for cannabis-adjacent businesses like lessors.

Passing Costs Onto the Tenant: Many cannabis leases are structured as triple net, or (NNN) leases. In NNN leases, landlords pass their insurance, tax, and other costs on to their tenant. That way, even if the tenant’s use of the property leads to a policy increase, the tenant will be financially responsible for the increase.

Mandating that the Tenant Maintain Insurance: Any good lease will specify the types and amounts of insurance coverage required from the tenant. These policies commonly include things like general liability, property insurance, and additional coverage as needed. As with other provisions mentioned above, insurance provisions often need adjustment for cannabis-specific uses.

5. Is It a Problem if My Cannabis Tenant Wants to Sublease to Other Operators?

California and local regulations limit subleasing for licensed cannabis businesses. This means that once a tenant gets a license, the property cannot be further sublicensed. There are situations where one party leases a particular property with the intention of subleasing it to an operator, in which case, a sublease may be available. However, it’s important for lessors to understand what their tenant wants to do.

It’s also important to note that a good lease’s assignment provisions (which often go hand-in-hand with sublease provisions) usually consider a change in equity holders of the tenant to be an assignment that requires the lessor’s prior written approval.

With that in mind, lessors often mitigate assignment and sublease-related issues by clearly define approval requirements, notice periods, and conditions for subleasing and assignment, specifically as related to changes of ownership of the tenant, and by vetting any proposed sublessee to better ensure timely payment and compliance under their lease.

6. Zoning and Local Regulations

Understanding zoning laws and local regulations is crucial when leasing to cannabis businesses. Non-compliance can result in fines, operational shutdowns, or other legal issues, which in turn can affect the lessor. Lessors don’t want to be in a position where the tenant blames the lessor for misrepresentation of a zoning-type issue affecting the property. Lessors should at least have a minimal understanding of what local zoning regulations affect the property, and whether the property is in the right zone for the desired cannabis use. A good lessor is usually careful to disclaim any zoning-type of representations in their lease agreement.

7. What Should Go Into My Cannabis Lease?

A well-crafted lease agreement is essential for protecting the landlord’s interests in a cannabis tenancy. Some of the provisions we usually see in cannabis leases include:

Permitted Use Provision: These provisions outline the specific activities allowed on the property and disclaim everything else. A tenant who engages in non-permitted uses will be in default and the lessor can take action against them.

Odor Control Provision: These provisions impose requirements for odor control, such as ventilation systems and air filtration, to minimize disturbances to neighboring properties. This is a good way that the lessor can protect against things like nuisance litigation from neighbors – something that we have seen happen again and again, especially as it relates to cultivation.

Security Requirements: Cannabis businesses are often the targets of crimes. No lessor wants property damage, vandalism, or theft. So a good lease will include provisions for security measures, such as surveillance systems, alarm systems, and access controls, to enhance property security and prevent damage, vandalism, or theft.

Insurance Requirements and Termination Provisions: As mentioned, a good cannabis lease will specify the types and minimum amounts of insurance coverage required from the tenant, as well as the circumstances under which a lessor can terminate the lease.

8. Should I Use an Attorney Experienced with California Cannabis Leases?

Absolutely. Given the complex legal landscape surrounding cannabis, consulting with an attorney experienced in California cannabis leases will almost certainly save money and reduce risks.

An attorney experienced with California cannabis leases can provide tailored advice, draft comprehensive lease agreements, and protect the lessor’s interests in case of legal challenges. They understand the nuances of cannabis regulations, potential liabilities, and can help lessors navigate the complexities of leasing real estate to a cannabis business.

The post A Guide to Leasing to California Cannabis Tenants appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.



from Canna Law Blog™ https://ift.tt/8boBAhL
via IFTTT

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Take first place with Super Silver Haze—August 2024’s Leafly HighLight

Keep going with this unstoppable, classic sativa.

The post Take first place with Super Silver Haze—August 2024’s Leafly HighLight appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/Bbp2uGk
via IFTTT

Star signs and cannabis strains: August 2024 horoscopes

As summer sun shines down, so do the stars. July holds many promising opportunities for each astrology sign; these are the perfect strains to make them happen.

The post Star signs and cannabis strains: August 2024 horoscopes appeared first on Leafly.



from Leafly https://ift.tt/FsHBcDQ
via IFTTT