Find the best grow tents of 2025. Leafly reviewed popular grow tents and chose the top picks for different size needs and budgets.
The post Leafly’s top 5 grow tents of 2025 appeared first on Leafly.
from Leafly https://ift.tt/aSv15hQ
via IFTTT
Find the best grow tents of 2025. Leafly reviewed popular grow tents and chose the top picks for different size needs and budgets.
The post Leafly’s top 5 grow tents of 2025 appeared first on Leafly.
Check out our picks for the best places to be high in Seattle, complete with a recommended strain to perfectly match the vibe.
The post The best places to be high in Seattle: A cannasseur’s guide to the Emerald City appeared first on Leafly.
We continue to represent myriad buyers and sellers of OLCC marijuana licenses. At any given time, we are running 10-12 of these transactions, and sometimes more, as we have for many years. Recently, there have been a few changes worth noting, particularly as to the OLCC protocols. I’ll touch briefly on other market dynamics, too.
Gone are the days of buyers and sellers waiting months to hear from an OLCC investigator, following submission of a change-of-ownership application. The OLCC’s “processing dates” page reports that change-of-ownership applications are now being assigned and processed through September 3, 2025 submissions. That’s not accurate. For the past month or so, we’ve seen a series of applications assigned within a week or two of submissions. These are moving fast.
OLCC licensing staff have begun to pre-screen submissions, and they are returning applications that lack required documents. The old practice of uploading placeholder documents will no longer be accepted. The idea here is to ensure organized applicants aren’t forced to wait in line behind their disorganized counterparts, causing a bottleneck. Going forward, incomplete applications will only be placed into the assignment queue once all missing documents are provided.
In case you missed it, OLCC filed a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on September 25, 2025. The chief purpose was to implement 2025 legislation, but some technical updates made their way in, as well. One of these is proposed rules is OAR 845-025-1135(2)(A)-(B) which provide that applicants:
“… must complete the application process within 60 calendar days of the Commission notifying the applicant that the application has been assigned” and that “if the applicant does not complete the application process within 60 calendar days, the application will be unassigned and place on hold.”
Getting booted into this kind of purgatory is a dangerous game. Most purchase agreements have drop-dead dates, escrow forfeiture provisions, and other adverse consequences for buyers in particular who fail to adequately move things forward. On the seller side, a booted application can be devastating where there are landlord issues, or where a seller has given over the keys under a management agreement—something people are still doing regularly, often against advice.
We’ve seen some delays recently regarding OLCC inspector availability. There probably aren’t enough of them. Several are also assigned to broad territories, making scheduling a challenge. Things tend to slow down over year-end holidays, too. With changes-in-ownership, final inspections are typically required on both the buyer and seller side, and parties need to be flexible here.
Many OLCC license and business sales are “fire sales” nowadays. Many sellers are failing businesses looking to salvage some value, under duress, and make a hasty exit. This gives buyers significant leverage, which should continue unabated despite OLCC improving its processes, and despite the ongoing moratorium on new license issuances. This market dynamic is the new normal, and has been for a while.
Oregon cannabis transactions continue to be plagued by unscrupulous or incompetent cannabis brokers, with a few exceptions. Every week, buyers and sellers come to us with confusing LOIs, hazardous purchase agreements, wacky leases and other contracts drafted by brokers, some of whom also purport to serve as escrows, application advisors and general deal consiglieres. We’ve talked to these brokers and even filed some unauthorized practice of law complaints; but ultimately it’s up to buyers and sellers to use common sense here.
We are seeing a large number of Chinese buyers in the last year or so, following the eastern European wave of purchasers a few years back. Existing chain operators also continue to scoop up licenses here and there. There is very little multi-state operator (MSO) action at this point, or Canadian public company interest.
I’ll touch on all of this again at the end of the year, in my annual Oregon “State of the State” post. Until then, take care and please give us a call if you need assistance liquidating, or acquiring, an Oregon cannabis license.
The post Oregon Cannabis: OLCC Licensing and Market Updates appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.
To celebrate 17 years of legal cannabis, here are seven reasons why you should buy your cannabis from the NSLC!
The post Seven reasons to buy your cannabis from the NSLC appeared first on Leafly.
As part of our Local Stories, Legendary Strains series, Lindsay MaHarry visits Sol Spirit Farm in the Emerald Triangle to see their special take on Blue Dream.
The post Blue Dream from Trinity County: See how Sol Spirit Farm uses innovative techniques to bring the legendary strain to life appeared first on Leafly.
Snag the best weed products for halloween 2025 for a hazy spooky season. Costumes aren’t required, but they are encouraged.
The post The best weed products for Halloween 2025 appeared first on Leafly.
Last month, I gave a big picture status update on cannabis licensing in Minnesota, highlighting the application window for lower-potency hemp edible (LPHE) licensing. LPHE products are a very hot market in Minnesota, and have been for a while. The LPHE application window opened on October 1st, as advertised, and is set to close on October 31st.
Under Minnesota law, LPHE’s are products intended for eating or consuming as a beverage. These products contain hemp concentrate or artificially derived delta-9 THC, combined with food ingredients. The full definition is available at 342.01(50).
Of note, LPHEs cannot:
It’s important to note that manufacturing and selling LPHEs and hemp-derived consumer products is limited to cannabis business license holders. Many of these cannabis licensees are hemp businesses that registered with the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) under a conversion protocol prior to August 31st. Other hemp licensees cannot manufacture and sell these products. Related, OCM has been clear that:
“At the close of the LPHE application period, OCM will begin enforcement actions against unlicensed sellers of lower-potency hemp edible products, who have not submitted an LPHE license application, are not in the application process for a cannabis business license or have not successfully obtained a cannabis business license.”
A variety of endorsements are available to LPHE retailers (LPHE-R), manufacturers (LPHE-M), and wholesalers (LPHE-W). These endorsements carry no additional costs beyond the baseline, license application fees.
Below is a breakdown of endorsements by type, lifted directly from the relevant OCM guidance.
This is required to manufacture, process, sell, handle, or store LPHEs (unless the LPHE is in final packaging). This endorsement is required for all LPHE-M license holders. This endorsement also allows LPHEs to be manufactured at the same premises where food is manufactured.
This is required to manufacture hemp concentrate or artificially derived cannabinoid products. All methods of extraction, concentration, and conversion, and all volatile chemicals intended to be used must be disclosed to OCM prior to receiving this endorsement.
For LPHE-M license holders who are performing extraction or concentration of cannabinoids, or conversion of artificially derived cannabinoids, additional certifications are also required before beginning operations. Such LPHE-M license holders must obtain third-party certifications from an independent industrial hygienist or a professional engineer for the following: (a) all electrical, gas, fire suppression, (b) exhaust systems; and (c) plans for the safe storage and disposal of hazardous substances, including but not limited to any volatile chemicals.
This is required for an LPHE-R license holder to allow on-site consumption at their establishment. This endorsement is only available to LPHE-R license holders. This endorsement also authorizes the business’s participation at an off-site hemp-derived/related event subject to compliance with any applicable local regulations.
This is required for an LPHE-R license holder intending to operate a retail establishment to sell LPHE products to customers who are 21 years of age and older. There are no additional application requirements necessary beyond the application requirements for an LPHE-R license.
This is required for an LPHE-R license holder intending to deliver LPHE products directly to customers aged 21 years and older. The endorsement requires the applicant to submit: (a) proof of insurance for each vehicle or general liability insurance with a limit of at least $1,000,000 for each occurrence; (b) a business plan demonstrating policies to avoid sales of LPHE products to individuals who are under 21 years of age; and (c) evidence the business will comply with applicable requirements.
Additionally, an LPHE-R license holder with a delivery endorsement must: (x) ensure LPHE products are not visible from outside the delivery vehicle; and (y) ensure a vehicle that contains LPHE products is either attended by an employee or secured by turning off the ignition, locking all doors and storage compartments, and removing operating keys or device.
This is required for a LPHE-W license holder intending to import LPHEs that are manufactured outside of the state with the intent to resell the products. This endorsement is only available to LPHE-W license holders and cannabis wholesaler license holders.
This is required for a LPHE-W license holder intending to transport LPHE products to other businesses. The endorsement requires the applicant to submit additional application materials. Transportation of LPHE products is otherwise authorized for LPHE-M and LPHE-R license holders and does not require a specific endorsement for these two licenses
This endorsement is available to LPHE-M and LPHE-W license holders and is required if the license holder intends to manufacture or purchase, store, transport, or sell products containing cannabinoids that do not qualify as LPHE products and are intended for sale outside of Minnesota. License holders seeking this endorsement must abide by requirements for manufacturing, storage, and transport.
The OCM guidance also contains detailed information on the supply chain overview, registration requirements (including application fees), licensing timelines, local government considerations, how to begin business operations, allowable business activities, and product requirements. If you are in the LPHE game, I’d strongly suggest you check it out.
For now, all eligible applicants should focus on getting those LPHE applications in prior to the October 31st deadline.
Please contact us if you have any questions on this process, or Minnesota cannabis more generally.
The post Minnesota Cannabis: Apply for Your Lower-Potency Hemp Edible License by October 31st appeared first on Harris Sliwoski LLP.